Somerset RSS Feed


EDF hits back over Hinkley Point complaint

EDF and Somerset County Council have shot down anti-nuclear campaigners’ claims that the energy giant has broken a time limit condition requiring it to remove a spoil heap from the Hinkley Point site by the end of last month.

Campaign group Stop Hinkley accused EDF of failing to remove spoil contaminated with asbestos left over from the construction of the original Hinkley site by August 31 – a condition of the planning consent granted to EDF by the county council last January.

In a letter to the County Gazette, Stop Hinkley spokesman Crispin Aubrey said: “If EDF cannot stick to the rules on something like this, then it doesn’t bode well for when it comes to more serious issues to do with operations at Hinkley Point.”

But Gordon Bell, a spokesman for EDF, argued that the delay was caused because the site contained more asbestos than it had originally expected, prompting the company to ask the county council for a deadline extension on August 22.

The county council validated the application on September 12, giving EDF until February 29, 2012.

He said: “EDF Energy has remained fully compliant in its remediation works at Hinkley Point.

“While carrying out the approved remediation work, EDF Energy contractors found more asbestos materials than initially expected.

“Consequently, more time is required to remove remediated materials in a safe and supervised way.

“EDF Energy is not contravening planning permission by carrying out certain remediation works within the site itself and the disposal of spoil to the Hinkley Point A turbine hall.

“This work is being carried out in the full knowledge of the county council.”

A county council spokesperson said it would “continue to monitor the situation.”

Comments(3)

Dr Dave says...
3:49pm Sat 24 Sep 11

Some people or "organisations" obviously have nothing better to do, have they???

PCAH says...
9:40am Sun 25 Sep 11

So Stop Hinkley were right then; if EDF had to apply for a 6-month time extension for removing the asbestos the planning consent must also be put back 6-months to comply with the original condition. Be more careful of your headlines; this one is very misleading.

Alex@SDA says...
10:38pm Sun 25 Sep 11

Consider this....

The original planning application included a specific number of vehicle movements to remove a pre-determined amount of waste over a specified route in a given time period. None of the above has been adhered to, in fact they have not even started this operation as yet with regard to this application.

They didn't get the sums right and in fact the amounts regards both counts as above are considerably increased.

Therefore the original planning application using the original figures & criteria should be deemed as null & void and they should apply again in full, not as an extension to the original.

This is flouting the rules, and given chance they (EdF) will continue in the above manner on future applications as well.

All this, and it hasn't even started yet!

click2find

Most popular