LEADING government figures yesterday rejected the suggestion that Tony Blair and Gordon Brown have reached an agreement on the handover of power.
This is despite increasing speculation that the prime ministerwill stand down soon after he completes 10 years in office next May.
Alistair Darling, a close Brown ally, yesterday echoed the robust denial issued by Downing Street in the wake of press reports that the prime minister's closest advisers were working to a timetable that would mean the prime minister handing over power to Mr Brown next summer.
Speaking on the BBC's Politics Show, Mr Darling, the transport secretary, said that there was no special deal.
"Now Gordon and Tony work closely together, there's hardly a day goes by when they're not working out what we need to do next to make sure that we make reforms that are absolutely necessary, " he added.
A Blair aide said that any speculation about the date of the prime minister's departure should be dismissed because he did not talk about it to close advisers, far less to the media.
According to a report in a Sunday newspaper, Lord Kinnock, the former Labour leader, has advised Mr Blair to fix a date to leave Downing Street.
The prime minister's critics would like to think Mr Brown would march the government in a different direction but the chancellor wants to dispel any suggestion that he would be any less keen on reform than his predecessor.
As David Cameron intensifies the battle for the centre ground, Mr Brown is paying a price for letting some of his supporters send out mixed messages. While senior Labour sources insist Mr Brown was as much an architect of New Labour as Mr Blair, disappointed Brownites have held out a promise that things might have been different had their man been in charge.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article