Should we dread the dredge?: SAS seriously concerned about marine mining plan

Surfers Against Sewage (SAS) is calling on people to have their say on a "massive and potentially devastating" coastal dredging proposal.

Marine Minerals Limited are applying for a licence to remove millions of tonnes of sediment from North Cornwall’s sea bed as little as 200 meters offshore at some of Cornwall’s beaches, including; St Ives Bay, Porthtowan, St Agnes and Perranporth.

Views can be registered with the Marine Management Organisation by tomorrow, Friday, February 8 by emailing marine.consents@marinemanagement.org.uk.

SAS says it first raised concerns about this issue when a Protect Our Waves petition was launched in August 2012. Click www.protectourwaves.org.uk/case-studies.php for more details.

A SAS spokesman said: "There are many potential adverse impacts associated with a proposal of this type, but SAS is especially concerned about threats to vital coastal processes, the marine environment, marine wildlife and local surfing resources. The North Cornish coastline is a valuable natural environment, already supporting thousands of jobs and generating millions of pounds for the region.

"Surfing alone brings in £64 million to Cornwall’s economy and supports 1,600 full time jobs. The dredging proposal targets tin reserves stored in the sand, washed out from Cornwall’s historic mining activity.

"The dredging areas Marine Minerals Limited has identified are also some of Cornwall’s premier beach resorts. The proposal requests permission to dredge as close as 200 meters from the shore. Several millions of tonnes of sediment will be removed, with approximately five per cent of the sediment refined for further use and the remaining 95 per cent returned to the sea floor."

SAS are contacting the MMO and listing the following concerns.

Coastal Processes: Removing and replacing several millions of tonnes of sediment has the potential to disrupting the natural build-up of sediment. This sediment plays a vital role in encouraging waves to break offshore, dissipating the majority of the wave’s energy before the waves reach the shore.

Disrupting the sediment could also impact on sand levels in the intertidal zones and above the high tide line at the beach. This could significantly reduce the quality of surfing waves and impair the beach experience for local residents and tourists.

Reanimating pollutants: Disrupting the sediment around the river mouths at St Ives Bay, Porthtowan, St Agnes and Perranporth could also reanimate pathogens associated with Combined Sewer Overflow discharges and heavy metals used in mining. These could have serious impacts on the health of water users and the wider environment Flora and fauna:

Removing millions of tons of sediment, processing it, then dumping it back on the seafloor it will impact biodiversity in the area. The species potentially at risk include seals, sharks, dolphins, crustaceans (crabs, lobsters etc.), sea fans and many more. They all play important roles in regulating our marine environment and support wildlife watching eco-tourism and diving. The special flora and fauna obviously support the important fishing economy, culturally important to the region.

SAS Campaign Director Andy Cummins says: “Disturbing and removing significant amounts of sediment from the North Cornish coast has the potential to devastate the fragile and complex environments that support surfing, tourism and fishing. SAS are raising these concerns and will continue to engage through the licencing application and we urge any interested parties to do the same.”

 

Comments(8)

Gill Zella Martin 09 says...
7:39am Thu 7 Feb 13

What happens if they dredge up a petrified rain forest like the one under the sea at Poldhu close to the shoreline. Parts of this were visible in the 1980s/1999s.

Gill Zella Martin 09 says...
7:42am Thu 7 Feb 13

Should have said 1980s/1990s I can't remember the exact year.

Wave says...
1:49pm Thu 7 Feb 13

The disturbance of toxic elements into the water and to land on the beach is too much of a risk.
Think of an other entrepreneurial idea.

KernBear says...
7:35pm Thu 7 Feb 13

Wave wrote:
The disturbance of toxic elements into the water and to land on the beach is too much of a risk.
Think of an other entrepreneurial idea.
This story is full of speculation and inaccuracy’s about mining. Typical enviro hype, just like global warming.

Wave says...
12:08am Fri 8 Feb 13

You could say what the inaccuracies are,and the hype.

kemosabe says...
1:03pm Fri 8 Feb 13

The only pathogens likely to be disturbed by this are the enviro fascists in SAS.

kemosabe says...
1:15pm Fri 8 Feb 13

SAS should remember that they are the one's responsible for everyone's high water bills in the SW, so they can forget my support, especailly as all of the environmental claims are completely without any scientific evidence.

Gill Zella Martin 09 says...
2:55pm Fri 8 Feb 13

I thought it was the European Union that said we had to clean up the beaches, we therefore have to pay South West Water extra for it. If the water companies had not been privatised then surely the whole country would be contributing. Therefore like having a choice with which ever electricity/gas/phon
e supplier one chooses to have, why can't I have Thames Water company supply my water, it would be cheaper and taste nicer.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree