Town Hall Talk: Mayor of Ilminster Emma Jane Taylor

Town Hall Talk: Mayor of Ilminster Emma Jane Taylor

Town Hall Talk: Mayor of Ilminster Emma Jane Taylor

First published in News

OVER the last two weeks Ilminster residents seem to have rather dominated Postbag in the News.

I do not have an issue with people expressing their views, but I would like to see those views informed by fact.

Some residents were claiming the Planning Inspector’s consideration of the Local Plan was over and the democratic process had been completed.

The impression given was that any individual who thought otherwise and still wished to contest the Plan was wasting taxpayers’ money.

A Local Plan process, for any area, is a long and drawn out procedure in which decisions are taken by a Planning Inspector.

SSDC have put their proposed amendments and modifications to the Local Plan before the Inspector.

When SSDC first submitted the Local Plan to the Inspector the proposed direction of growth was the south east end of the town and at that time residents living in the area were given the opportunity to air their views to the Inspector.

SSDC’s proposed amendments have changed the direction of growth in Ilminster to the south west end of town.

On June 10 the residents who submitted objections to SSDC on the direction of growth being in the south west of the town will have the opportunity to meet with the Inspector.

I was taught that a democratic process involved views of all sides being heard, and this has not yet happened.

So, if, during the SSDC consultation process, you indicated that you did not agree with the direction of growth being along Canal Way, please do not feel that you have no right to talk to the Inspector or that you are wasting taxpayers’ money.

You did not create this long-winded process and the money being spent does not cover just Ilminster.

You have a democratic right to be heard.

I was on Herne Hill last week with fellow councillors and members of the public discussing how we could ensure its future.

Standing on the lower slopes of the hill, I realised with horror that once a housing development appears at the bottom Herne Hill will never be the same.

The town council will struggle to keep this area of natural beauty with its diverse range of fauna and wildlife as the haven residents and visitors to Ilminster have come to enjoy.

Once the democratic Local Plan process is complete and a final decision taken, whatever that decision, we will all have to accept it.

However, at the moment that democratic process has not been completed, and until that time if you so wish you have the opportunity voice your opinion.

What I do know is that the final decision will have a long-term impact on the future of our town, its housing, its employment, its town centre and its open spaces.

Comments (2)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

10:01pm Sat 3 May 14

orchardman says...

Nice of the Mayor to show her head above the parapet, unlike most of her recent predecessors, to try and clarify the Local Plan. However, even before the final outcome has been decided, it is interesting to note that a private developer is/ has applied for planning permission for the Shudrick Lane site, which, if granted means not only will the Local Plan have to be at Canal Way, but we'll also lose the open land at Shudrick Lane. Of course, this would make Cllr. Goodalls task a lot easier, since as chair of open spaces, there won't be much open space left to chair!. As I said previously, there's a nasty smell surrounding this whole issue, particularly with the Shudrick Lane developer moving in so soon after the powers that be decided to shift things back to Canal Way!.
Nice of the Mayor to show her head above the parapet, unlike most of her recent predecessors, to try and clarify the Local Plan. However, even before the final outcome has been decided, it is interesting to note that a private developer is/ has applied for planning permission for the Shudrick Lane site, which, if granted means not only will the Local Plan have to be at Canal Way, but we'll also lose the open land at Shudrick Lane. Of course, this would make Cllr. Goodalls task a lot easier, since as chair of open spaces, there won't be much open space left to chair!. As I said previously, there's a nasty smell surrounding this whole issue, particularly with the Shudrick Lane developer moving in so soon after the powers that be decided to shift things back to Canal Way!. orchardman
  • Score: 6

11:51am Sun 4 May 14

regularreader says...

Democratic process is all very well providing everyone has an equal share of the vote, but with developments such as this, big business and titled land-owners have extra "clout" which makes what should be a fair process into a farce.
Democratic process is all very well providing everyone has an equal share of the vote, but with developments such as this, big business and titled land-owners have extra "clout" which makes what should be a fair process into a farce. regularreader
  • Score: 3

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree