LiveExtension sought to badger cull in Somerset

First published in News
Last updated
by

Enable automatic updates every minute? YES NO

Summary

  • Extension sought to badger cull in Somerset
  • Protestors claim to have disrupted process
  • Just 850 badgers of original 2,081 target killed so far

4:10pm

OFFICIALS at the RSPCA have labelled the pilot badger cull 'farcical'.

Gavin Grant, chief executive, said: "The six-week trials were intended as a way of testing the effectiveness and humaneness of shooting badgers as a means of controlling bovine TB in cattle.

"If they have failed to kill the numbers needed in the set time frame – then surely it can clearly be judged to be ineffective.

“Frankly this whole situation is a farce. They keep moving the goalposts on how many badgers exist and how many need to be killed, but whatever the figures it is clear that the system has failed."

10:51am

This is The West Country: BADGERS: What about the farmers? says Alan Burridge

10:51am

In response to the announcement, National Farmers' Union president Peter Kendall said he understood the companies managing the two pilot areas had gone to great lengths to ensure the operations had been carried out safely and humanely and he welcomed Owen Paterson’s recognition of the work that had been carried out.

He said: “After the Secretary of State’s comments today on the progress that has been made, I want to thank those involved in carrying out what is a very important first step on the long road towards eradicating TB in cattle, in badgers and from our countryside. Safety and humaneness are two important tests.

“I am also pleased to hear confirmation from the government chief vet that the current cull operations in Somerset to date will deliver disease reduction as part of a four-year plan.

“I understand that the company carrying out the cull in Somerset has applied to Natural England to extend the culling period to enhance its disease control. They made this application towards the end of the six-week pilot cull and I understand a decision will be taken this week whether to extend the licence.

“The knowledge learned from these two badger cull pilot areas will be invaluable in helping to deliver future roll out of badger control operations in areas where the incidence of TB is rife.

“Our absolute focus, and that of everyone involved, is disease control. More than 38,000 cattle were slaughtered in Great Britain in 2012 because of bovine TB. These badger cull pilots are a very important first step in what is a 25-year strategy to eradicate this terrible and infectious disease."

10:31am

ENVIRONMENT Secretary Owen Paterson has just delivered the following statement to the House of Commons:

"The two badger cull pilots, in Somerset and Gloucestershire, were designed to test that controlled shooting is a safe, humane and effective means of reducing badger numbers.

Successfully tackling bovine TB (bTB) in the badger population is a key element in our strategy to rid England of bTB within 25 years.

Today I am announcing to the House that the six-week period of the Somerset TB control pilot cull was completed on 6 October.

Current indications suggest that the pilot has been safe, humane and effective in delivering a reduction in the badger population of just under 60 per cent.

We set ourselves a challenging target of aiming to ensure that 70 per cent of the badger population was removed during the pilot.

The Chief Veterinary Officer (CVO) has advised that the 60 per cent reduction this year will deliver clear disease benefits as part of a 4-year cull.

However, Natural England are considering an application from Somerset for a short extension of the culling period, as provided for under the agreement with the Company.

The advice of the CVO is that further increasing the number of badgers culled would improve those benefits even further and enable them to accrue earlier.

The targets for this cull were set at the outset on the basis of population estimates carried out in September 2012. This was repeated in August 2013 immediately before the culls started.

The results of this latest exercise show that the estimated number of badgers is significantly fewer in both areas compared to last summer.

In Somerset the latest population estimate is 1,450 compared to 2,400 last year, and in Gloucestershire 2,350 compared to 3,400.

In the six weeks of the cull, 850 badgers have been removed in Somerset.

One of the lessons we have learned already from this pilot is that in order to ensure high levels of safety and humaneness, the cull period may need to be longer than six weeks in future.

The Independent Panel of Experts will consider all the information which has been collated during the culls and it will be made publicly available after the culls have finished.

The cull in Gloucestershire is still on-going and I will make a further statement when the 6 weeks is completed. I understand that this morning Gloucestershire is also submitting an application for an extension to Natural England.

To achieve our aim of ridding England of bTB within 25 years will require long-term solutions and considerable national resolve.

This Government is committed to tackling the disease in all reservoirs and by all available means. Our cattle industry and the countryside deserve no less."

9:07am

WHAT is your view on the proposal to extend the badger cull? Have your say using the comments form below, email us newsdesk@countygazette.co.uk or Tweet us @CountyGazette

8:30am

8:12am

ORGANISERS of the controversial badger cull in parts of Taunton Deane and West Somerset are seeking to extend it by three weeks after killing fewer of the animals than anticipated.

An initial six-week culling period finished at the weekend, during which only 850 badgers were killed, a number short of the target of 2,081.

Officials at Defra insist the amount of badgers culled so far will make an impact on cases of bovine TB but it has now emerged the company carrying out the cull will seek an extension.

Opponents of the cull have been carrying out night patrols in the Somerset zone in a bid to disrupt the culling process.

Comments (5)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

9:10am Wed 9 Oct 13

Koenigninners says...

Is the company responsible for the cull, who are asking for another 3 weeks going to do it Free of charge ?
Is the company responsible for the cull, who are asking for another 3 weeks going to do it Free of charge ? Koenigninners
  • Score: 0

10:31am Wed 9 Oct 13

sciencefirst says...

Presumably they're not counting all the badgers illegally killed- such as those recently snared by a certain farmer near Chard?

It seems that all they can do is spout useless misinformation and meaningless figures in an attempt to justify a pointless and immoral exercise, that in all probability will not reduce BTB, but more likely, will just make it worse.

The only sensible approach is to focus on progress with vaccination, and abandon the cull.
Presumably they're not counting all the badgers illegally killed- such as those recently snared by a certain farmer near Chard? It seems that all they can do is spout useless misinformation and meaningless figures in an attempt to justify a pointless and immoral exercise, that in all probability will not reduce BTB, but more likely, will just make it worse. The only sensible approach is to focus on progress with vaccination, and abandon the cull. sciencefirst
  • Score: 0

11:17am Wed 9 Oct 13

Tinhharris says...

If you know anything about TB vaccination sciencefirst, you would be aware that vaccination not readily available, and has a poor uptake of immunity, 30 per cent or less. I'd rather see vaccination, but it would not be successful at this stage. Farmers are not keen on vaccination of their cattle, as testing commonly used can not distinguish between a vaccinated cow, or an infected cow accurately. I assume by your user name that you'd like evidence based science to come first, so lets at least get the facts (unless a vet knows better?) straight. Do you not think cattle farmers would vaccinate if it was effective rather than lose a cow?

I understood the point of the cull was to see if a certain number could be culled in a certain time, was i wrong?
If you know anything about TB vaccination sciencefirst, you would be aware that vaccination not readily available, and has a poor uptake of immunity, 30 per cent or less. I'd rather see vaccination, but it would not be successful at this stage. Farmers are not keen on vaccination of their cattle, as testing commonly used can not distinguish between a vaccinated cow, or an infected cow accurately. I assume by your user name that you'd like evidence based science to come first, so lets at least get the facts (unless a vet knows better?) straight. Do you not think cattle farmers would vaccinate if it was effective rather than lose a cow? I understood the point of the cull was to see if a certain number could be culled in a certain time, was i wrong? Tinhharris
  • Score: 0

12:11pm Wed 9 Oct 13

FreeSpeech? says...

Astonishing how many incompetent a**eholes you can get running so called scientific research. They have no idea how many badgers there are in to cull zones so how do they know when they have reached the required 70%, in one breath they state that they are trying to see if it will have an effect of the Btb in the cull zones and the next breath it's all to do with see if a cull can be carried out humanely. Now i understand that as they can't shoot enough badgers they are cage trapping them and then shooting when the whole idea of shooting in the first place was the latter was too expensive, why they can't vaccinate them them if they are trapping them God only knows.
My conclusion is they haven't got a clue and the farmers are gullible.
Astonishing how many incompetent a**eholes you can get running so called scientific research. They have no idea how many badgers there are in to cull zones so how do they know when they have reached the required 70%, in one breath they state that they are trying to see if it will have an effect of the Btb in the cull zones and the next breath it's all to do with see if a cull can be carried out humanely. Now i understand that as they can't shoot enough badgers they are cage trapping them and then shooting when the whole idea of shooting in the first place was the latter was too expensive, why they can't vaccinate them them if they are trapping them God only knows. My conclusion is they haven't got a clue and the farmers are gullible. FreeSpeech?
  • Score: 0

12:34pm Wed 9 Oct 13

scally666 says...

tory scum
tory scum scally666
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree